- Register


Home>AUTOMATION>Sensors >Do You Know Your Arc-Seconds from your Gradians?

Do You Know Your Arc-Seconds from your Gradians?

18 March 2013

Angle sensors are generally rated and, just as importantly, priced according to their measurement performance. But performance is stated in a variety of ways and some manufacturers confuse matters by using crafty ‘spec-manship’ says Mark Howard of Zettlex

The instrumentation industry seems adept at confusing its customers. For example, take the number of terms used to describe a device that measures angle: rotary sensor, angular position sensor, angle transducer, rotary encoder, shaft encoder, rotation transducer, and so on. Each term does have its own specific connotation but for most engineers, the precise meaning of the terminology is secondary to their need to measure angle. Here, the term ‘angle sensor’ will be used.

Over the last century, most of the main physical principles and laws have been used to measure angle – potentiometer (Ohm’s law), magnetic (Hall, magnetostriction & magnetoresistive effects), inductive (Faraday’s laws), capacitive effects, optical and laser. Each technique has its own strengths and weaknesses. For example, optical and capacitive devices offer high levels of precision but are unreliable in wet or dirty environments, so they tend to be chosen for laboratory or test equipment, but tend not to be used in petrochemical, military or aerospace applications. Similarly, potentiometers are rarely chosen for high vibration environments due to the limited life of their resistive tracks. Unsurprisingly, the way in which the different products are presented and specified on their data sheets tends to accentuate their positives and remain silent on the negatives. This is further complicated as certain industries have their own preferred measurement units and terminology.

The aim of this article is to provide some clarification and to shed some light on the common pitfalls to avoid when choosing an angle sensor.

Measurement performance is quoted in a myriad of different units. Any proper comparison between products should be based on common units.
Pulses per rev (PPR) – PPR is commonly quoted for incremental angle sensors, especially optical devices, and describes the number of pulses that the device outputs per revolution. The product’s PPR is not necessarily connected to accuracy. A common misconception is that an angle sensor that produces 1,000 PPR is accurate to 1/1000th of a rev. But this is incorrect!

Counts per rev (CPR) – many angle sensors output two lots of pulses – usually referred to as A/B pulse streams (in quadrature) so that direction of travel is indicated. Accordingly, for each PPR there are two leading edges and two trailing edges, which can then be used to generate CPR. The difference is important – a device with 1024PPR has 4 times the resolution of a device offering 1024CPR.

Bits – the number of bits in an angle sensor’s output is an increasingly common term due to the increasing use of digital outputs such as RS422, CANbus, etc. Each additional bit doubles the quoted resolution. For example, a 12bit product will output 4,096 steps over a rev, whereas a 14bit product will output 16,384 steps. A ‘couple of bits’ makes a huge difference to measurement performance. Note also the difference between x bits of resolution and y bits of accuracy. E.g. an angle sensor may be specified as 10bits of resolution with 8bits of accuracy – i.e. 1024 steps per rev with an accuracy of 1/256 of a rev.

Radians – radians are still widely used by the military, aerospace and scientific sectors, especially in motion control. A radian is the angle subtended by a circle’s arc whose length is numerically equal to the circle’s radius. There are 2Π radians per rev. A milli-radian (usually ‘millirad’) is 1/1000th of a radian and a micro-radian (usually ‘urad’) is 1/1000th of a milliradian. The ‘mil’ is commonly used by military organisations and provides the handy property of subtension – that 1 mil approximately subtends 1 metre at a distance of 1000 metres. It’s a useful unit of measure if you’re lobbing shells onto an enemy position.

Gradians – the gradian is a unit of angle equivalent to 1⁄400 of a revolution. It is also known as a gon, grad, or grade. One grad equals 9⁄10 of a degree. The unit originated in France as the grade, along with the metric system. Although attempts at a general introduction were made, the unit has only been adopted in some countries and specialised areas, such as surveying. Subdivisions of gradian used in surveying are c's (1c = 0.01grad) and cc's (1cc = 0.0001grad).

Degrees, Arc-Minutes & Arc- Seconds – wouldn’t life be simpler if everyone used degrees? Well it would, but who said life was going to be simple, especially for a design engineer? So 1revolution = 360 degrees, but each degree can be divided up into 60arc-minutes and each arc-minute can be divided up into 60arc-seconds. Accordingly, 1degree = 3600arc-seconds.

Percentage – percentage is often used to describe the accuracy or linearity of lower performance angle sensors and should rightly be (but often isn’t) specified in terms of % of full-scale. Importantly, the full-scale of some angle sensors is not 360degrees but may be 60, 90, 120 or 180degrees. So a product with a full-scale of 90degrees and a linearity of 0,1% of full-scale is likely to be more accurate than a device with 360degree full-scale and 0,05% linearity over full-scale.
Use the look-up table, above right, to convert between the most common units.

When comparing different products, as well as using common units, it’s also important to have a common meaning of the terminology. The main terms to note are:
Accuracy – a sensor’s output veracity against a perfect scale.

Resolution – the smallest increment or decrement in position that a sensor can measure.

Precision – refers to a sensor's reproducibility. This is most usefully expressed in terms of the sensor’s repeatability.

Linearity – how well a sensor's actual performance across a specified range matches a straight line. Linearity is usually measured in terms of a deviation, or non- linearity, from an ideal straight line. In many cases linearity and accuracy are the same in the absence of any offset.

For a surprisingly large number of applications, the critical factors are resolution and repeatability rather than linearity or accuracy. Getting this wrong and over- specifying the accuracy or linearity requirements could be costly.

When comparing performance factors between angle sensors it is important to read the small print of the product’s data sheet (if there is no small print or clarification notes in a data sheet, it may be an indication that it’s not that good a product). Common pitfalls are:

Accuracy measured at a specific temperature and/or humidity. This can be a fair indication that the product will drift relative to temper- ature or humidity, so also look out for its temperature/ humidity coefficient. If a temperature coefficient is not stated it may be a sign that it’s inconveniently large.

Accuracy measured at specified installation tolerances. In some OEM sensors, installation requires a Swiss watch maker with a steady hand and a microscope to match the installation tolerances required for the product’s stated accuracy.

Mismatch between resolution and repeatability. In some products resolution will be stated without any mention of repeatability, or the resolution is specified at a much finer level than repeatability.

High resolution but slow speed operation. One way for a sensor manufacturer to achieve high resolution cheaply is to slow the measurement rate and carry out lots of averaging. So resolution and repeatability need to be considered in light of measurement speed.

For example, consider this particular angle sensor in question: Quoted resolution is 21bits or 2,097,152 steps per revolution. Repeatability is stated as +/-1bit at 1kHz so the quoted resolution is a true rather than inflated representation. Accuracy is stated as a linearity (max. deviation from true position) over full-scale of 360degrees at <40 arc-seconds (so <0.003% of full-scale). Crucially, these parameters are stated with realistically achievable installation tolerances of +/-0.35mm axially and <0.25mm radially. Temperature coefficient over the range of -55 or -40 to 80 deg C is stated as <0.25ppm/K over full-scale, which equates to a temperature drift of about 2 arc-seconds for every 10 degrees of temperature change (i.e. tiny compared to the likely differential thermal expansion of the host system). Since the devices are inductive rather than optical or capacitive, there will be no deterioration due to humidity or foreign matter.
  • Ensure you have consistent units
  • Read the small print of any data sheet and ensure you fully understand it, particularly the difference between resolution, repeatability and accuracy
  • Consider the effect of installation tolerances on measurement performance
  • Consider the effects of humidity, foreign matter, lifetime and temperature on measurement performance
  • Run a test and verify the manufacturer’s data yourself.